The Hypocrisy Files: Religious Liberty: Non-Christians Need Not Apply, Part 3
“Let’s put this ‘religious liberty vs. contraception’ controversy in a slightly different light. What if, instead of Catholic institutions — hospitals, colleges, charities, etc. — there were in this country large Muslim organizations of the same sort employing sizable numbers of non-Muslim women?
“… And what if the mullahs ruled out insurance coverage for women’s reproductive health for all of its female employees because of Shariah law? What side do you come down on then? Still think the religious institution calls the shots?”
— Warren Robeson, Nashville, Tennessee
“Is there hypocrisy in argument about Catholic religious liberty?”
The Tennessean, March 8, 2012
Repost This Article
Related posts (automatically generated):
- The Hypocrisy Files: Religious Liberty: Non-Christians Need Not Apply, Part 2
- The Hypocrisy Files: Religious Liberty: Non-Christians Need Not Apply, Part 1
- The Hypocrisy Files: “Extremely Religious” Child Abusers
- The Hypocrisy Files: Uterus Envy
- The Hypocrisy Files: Church Prohibits Donations to Komen, But Gladly Takes Komen Money
The article was already taken down. Censorship, anyone? It still seems to be located in Google’s cache, though.
Looks like Mr. Robeson hit a nerve (or several). Thanks for the cache link!